DNS Research. Trading and Investing Blog. Free articles every day.

Avoiding Mean Reversion Traps: Why Some Bounces Fail and How to Filter Them

advertisement

Navigating the Counter-Trend Minefield: A Tactical Framework for Filtering Dead-Cat Bounces and False Reversals

The financial markets are a perpetual war between momentum and equilibrium. For every sustained trend, there exists a gravitational pull back to the mean—a statistical tendency for an asset’s price to revert to its moving average or a defined value range. This phenomenon creates lucrative opportunities for mean reversion traders who fade overextensions. However, the allure of buying a dip or shorting a spike is fraught with peril. The graveyard of trading accounts is littered with positions taken against a powerful trend during a temporary pause, not a true reversal.

The core challenge is differentiation: distinguishing between a healthy retracement (a temporary counter-trend move that will resolve in the direction of the primary trend) and a mean reversion trap (a move that signals the beginning of a full trend reversal or a continuation of the dominant move after a brief, violent snap-back). This article dissects the anatomy of these failing bounces, outlining the specific technical, structural, and macro-economic filters required to separate high-probability reversion trades from catastrophic capital losses.


The Flawed Premise: Why Price Alone Fails

Most novice traders approach mean reversion using a simplistic RSI (Relative Strength Index) or Bollinger Band touch. The logic is seductive: “The price is stretched beyond two standard deviations; therefore, it must snap back.” This statistical assumption is dangerously naive. In strongly trending markets, price can remain in overbought or oversold territory for extended periods, a phenomenon known as “trend persistence.” A moving average is merely a lagging calculation of past prices; it holds no magnetic power over future price action.

The primary reason bounces fail is the confusion between exhaustion and absorption. A true exhaustion move shows a parabolic climax with decreasing participation—volume spikes but momentum wanes. In contrast, a failed bounce against a robust trend occurs because institutional order flow (smart money) is using the overextension to execute massive orders in the direction of the trend, not against it. When a stock gaps down violently, the dip buyer stepping in is often buying from a seller who is not closing a long position, but rather initiating a massive new short. Price does not revert because there is no vacuum above; there is a ceiling of supply.


Identifying Structural Violations (The First Hard Filter)

Before considering a counter-trend trade, one must assess whether the market structure itself has been compromised. A bounce is vastly more likely to fail if it breaks a critical level that previously provided support or resistance.

The Fractured Swing Low: In an uptrend, a mean reversion pullback should ideally hold above the prior higher low. If the pullback slices through that low with ease (conviction), the market is no longer in an uptrend; it is in a state of distribution. A subsequent bounce that rallies back into that broken level is now facing a reconfigured market where previous buyers are trapped. These trapped longs become sellers on any retest, creating a heavy supply zone. Buying this bounce is not mean reversion; it is catching a falling knife in a nascent downtrend.

The “V-Bounce” vs. the “Base-Bounce”:

  • Base-Bounce (High Probability): A healthy retracement takes time. It grinds sideways, creating a tight consolidation near a moving average. This allows sellers to exhaust, and the cost basis of new buyers to stabilize.
  • V-Bounce (Low Probability in a Strong Trend): A sharp, immediate reversal that mirrors the prior impulse move is a warning sign. It often indicates a short squeeze rather than genuine accumulation. Squeezes are violent but short-lived. Unless the V-bounce is accompanied by massive, sustained buying volume that dwarfs the selling volume of the decline, it is likely a trap. The market needs to build a base to confirm that prices are acceptable; a vertical snap-back does not build a base—it creates a pocket of volatility that often gets retested.

Volume & Volatility Regimes: Reading the Tape

Volume is the single most reliable discriminator between a genuine mean reversion event and a failing bounce. The adage “volume precedes price” is critical here, but it must be analyzed contextually.

Down-Volume Bounces: Consider a stock in a primary downtrend that experiences a sharp sell-off. If the subsequent bounce occurs on significantly declining volume, it signals a lack of conviction among buyers. The bounce is essentially a pause in selling pressure, not an influx of buying interest. These are classic bear market rallies. They fill gaps and reset overbought conditions before the downtrend resumes.

Up-Volume Failures (The Climax Reversal): Conversely, a bounce can fail even on high volume. This occurs during a “blow-off” low. If a stock drops on massive volume, then bounces on even larger volume, but the price stalls at a minor Fibonacci level (e.g., the 38.2% retracement), it signals a massive battle. The high volume on the bounce indicates strong dip-buying, but the inability to advance further tells you that the selling pressure is equally aggressive. When a bounce fails to progress on above-average volume, the subsequent leg down is usually severe.

Volatility Compression (The Squeeze): A sophisticated filter involves the Volatility Index (VIX) or Average True Range (ATR). Mean reversion trades work best when volatility is contracting. When volatility is expanding (ATR rising sharply), the market is in a state of panic or euphoria. Attempting to fade a move during volatility expansion is like trying to stop a freight train. A successful bounce requires volatility to peak and begin to decline. If you buy an oversold condition but the ATR is still climbing, the odds are that the trend will accelerate against your position before volatility subsides. Wait for the first red candle in ATR to confirm that the wild swings are calming.


The Timing Trap: Early Entry vs. Confirmation

The most common psychological failure in mean reversion is entering too early. Seeing a green candle after a red streak triggers a “buy the dip” response. This is a timing trap. In a true trend reversal (the opposite of mean reversion), there are specific structural clues. In a failing bounce (mean reversion trap), there are no clues—just a violent oscillation.

The “Lower High” Confirmation: To short a failing bounce, you do not sell the first green candle. You sell the lower high. This requires patience.

  1. Price drops below a support level.
  2. Price bounces off the ensuing low.
  3. Price rallies but fails to reclaim the broken support level (now resistance).
  4. Price forms a lower high and begins to roll over.

The lower high is the failure point. This trade offers a tight stop loss (above the lower high) and a high reward target (the recent low). For long-side mean reversion (buying dips in an uptrend), the mirror image applies: wait for the bounce to create a higher low after the sell-off, confirming that sellers are losing control.

The Time Factor: Use time-based filters. A bounce that occurs too quickly after a major break is suspect. A genuine reversion event often requires a “time correction” rather than a “price correction.” If a stock falls 10% in two days and bounces 5% in one day, that is not a reversal; it is a compressed move. If a stock falls 10% over three weeks and then consolidates for two weeks, the subsequent bounce has a higher statistical probability of succeeding because the seller base had time to be absorbed.


Technical Correlation: Volume Profile and the POC

Moving averages and RSI are reactive indicators. To filter traps effectively, turn to Volume Profile—a tool that shows price levels where the most trading activity occurred. The Point of Control (POC) is the price level with the highest traded volume.

  • The Trap: A stock trades below its POC and bounces. Target the POC as a resistance level. However, if the POC is “thin” (low volume), the bounce may slice right through it.
  • The Filter: Look at the shape of the profile. If the price is falling away from a massive POC cluster into a vacuum of low volume, a bounce will occur (air pockets fill). But if the downside is filled with a thick layer of high-volume nodes (support levels), the bounce might actually mark a reversal.

Conversely, when a bounce fails, it usually fails at the Value Area High (VAH) or the Weekly POC. If price recaptures the POC on a closing basis, the trap is invalidated; the trend may be flipping. If price touches the POC and stalls with a doji candle or an engulfing bearish pattern, the bounce has failed. This level acts as a magnet for trapped buyers from the previous distribution phase.


Macro & Fundamental Headwinds (The “Why” Filter)

Technical analysis alone is insufficient. A stock “bouncing” against a deteriorating macro backdrop is a trap. You cannot mean-revert a fundamental shift.

Earnings & Guidance: A stock that gaps down 20% on earnings but bounces 5% the next day is not “oversold.” It is re-pricing to a lower valuation. The bounce is a liquidity event (shorts covering) against a wall of fundamental selling by institutional funds who are downgrading the stock. In this scenario, never buy the dip. Instead, look to short the rally into resistance (e.g., the gap fill). The failed bounce occurs because the valuation is no longer supported by the earnings power of the company. The moving average is not the support; the fair value is lower.

Interest Rate/Bond Yield Correlations: In a risk-off environment, a bounce in a high-beta tech stock is a trap if the 10-year Treasury yield is breaking out to the upside. The bounce is a “relief rally,” but the underlying selling pressure is driven by the discount rate. Mean reversion in a stock ignores the macro catalyst that created the initial sell-off. If the catalyst (e.g., hawkish Fed) has not been alleviated, the bounce is a gift to sellers.

The “Dead Cat with a Collar” Filter: Analyze the volume of the decline relative to the 20-day average. If the selling volume was 5x the average, the asset was hit with a “major event.” A bounce on half the average volume is structurally unsound. The proper filter is to compare the velocity of the decline. A slow grind down is less likely to snap back violently than a fast crash. However, a slow grind down often precedes a failed bounce because the sellers are methodical, not panicked. Panic sellers create a vacuum for a bounce (which then fails); methodical sellers create a ceiling of supply that prevents a bounce from even starting.


The Confluence Matrix: A Scoring System for Filtering

To systematically avoid traps, create a quantitative mental model. Do not take a trade unless it meets a minimum threshold of confluence. Score the bounce attempt on the following criteria (out of 5):

  1. Location: Is the bounce occurring in a historical high-volume zone (support/resistance)? (Yes = 1 point)
  2. Structure: Has the price formed a distinct basing pattern (higher low) after the sell-off, or is it a straight V? (Base = 1 point, V = 0)
  3. Volume: Is the bounce volume declining compared to the sell-off volume, yet still consistent enough to show interest? (Yes = 1 point)
  4. Macro/News: Is the dominant news narrative regarding the asset neutral or improving? (Yes = 1 point)
  5. Market Breadth: For indices, are more stocks participating in the bounce, or is it a narrow rally led by a few mega-caps? (Broad = 1 point, Narrow = 0)

The Trap Zone: Trades scoring 0–2 are statistically high-risk traps.
The Reversion Zone: Trades scoring 3–4 are viable for a scalping mean reversion.
The Reversal Zone: Trades scoring 5 are no longer mean reversion; they are trend reversal opportunities.


Practical Execution: Stop Placement and Invalidation

The definition of a “failed bounce” must be predetermined before entry. Most traders get caught because they move their stop loss to break-even too quickly, allowing the market to shake them out, or they set the stop too wide, risking ruin.

The Invalidation Point:

  • For Shorts (Fading a Bounce): The trade is invalidated when price closes above the high of the bounce candle that triggered the entry. However, a tighter filter is using the 50-period EMA (Exponential Moving Average) on a 15-minute chart. If the bounce reclaims that EMA with force, the distribution thesis is wrong.
  • For Longs (Buying a Pullback): The trade is invalidated when the market takes out the low of the pullback before the bounce occurs. If you buy a pullback and the market breaks the recent pivot low, the mean reversion has failed; it is now a new downtrend leg.

The “Slippery Slope” Filter: Watch the bid-ask spread on the bounce. In a failing bounce, the spread widens as momentum fades. If the spread begins to widen during your trade, it indicates that market makers are reducing their risk and liquidity is evaporating. This is a warning sign that the bounce is losing its bid, and you should exit regardless of your stop level.


The Context of the Higher Timeframe (HTF)

A bounce on the 5-minute chart is irrelevant if the 4-hour chart is in a freefall. High-quality filters always align with the higher timeframe trend.

Scenario A (HTF Downtrend): The 4-hour chart shows a series of lower lows. The 15-minute chart shows an oversold bounce. In a HTF downtrend, the probability of a bounce failing is exponentially higher. The bounce merely serves to reset the 4-hour RSI. Therefore, you do not buy the bounce; you sell the lack of continuation.

Scenario B (HTF Uptrend): The 4-hour chart is making higher highs. The 15-minute chart drops to the 50-period EMA. This is the best environment for a mean reversion long. The bounce has a high probability of success because the HTF trend is pulling price back up. The filter is the HTF trend direction. If the HTF trend is against you, do not attempt to buy the dip; you are fighting the algorithm that is stacking orders in the direction of the HTF.

The “Drifting” ADX Filter: Use the ADX (Average Directional Index) to measure trend strength.

  • ADX > 30: The trend is strong (either up or down). Mean reversion is dangerous. Do not buy oversold conditions, as they will stay oversold.
  • ADX < 20: The market is ranging. Mean reversion is safe, but the profit target is smaller.
  • ADX shifting from 40 to 25: The trend is weakening. Bounces are more likely to succeed because the trend is losing its grip.

Psychological Warfare: The Narrative Trap During the Bounce

The market creates a compelling narrative during a failing bounce to lure retail traders. When a stock bounces, the financial media immediately publishes headlines like “Stock Recovers from Oversold Levels” or “Bulls Defend Key Support.” This is a psychological hook. Failing bounces are characterized by a lack of follow-through.

The “High Five” Scenario: A stock drops 8%. It bounces 3%. Traders who bought the dip feel vindicated. The media celebrates. Then, the next day, the stock opens higher but immediately sells off, closing below the previous day’s low. This “bull trap” catches the dip-buyers and forces them to liquidate—adding fuel to the downside fire. The filter here is to track the Open Interest in the Options chain. If a failing bounce is occurring, you will notice that the Calls at the current strike price are building significantly. This signals that retail is buying upside speculation. Smart money sells this retail demand to the market makers, who hedge by selling the underlying stock—pushing price down.

Volume Spikes Against the Bounce: During the bounce, look for massive volume on down candles that interrupt the up-move. If the bounce rallies for three hours but the hourly chart shows that the largest volume candle in that rally was a red candle, it indicates a huge seller waiting in the wings. The bounce is being “capped.”


Case Study: The “Gap and Crap”

A common mean reversion trap occurs after a gap down. Retail traders see a stock gap down below support and buy the open, expecting a “gap fill.” This is one of the most dangerous trades.

Why it Fails:

  1. Gaps below support are frequently caused by overnight news (earnings, lawsuits, macro).
  2. The overnight session has thin liquidity. The gap down occurs because there are no bids, not because of a massive sell order. The stock opens, and the market tries to find equilibrium.
  3. The bounce to fill the gap is often muted because the news is fresh. As the morning progresses, institutional selling begins, and the price rolls over, “filling the gap” to the downside instead of the upside.

The Filter: Volume analysis during the pre-market. If the pre-market volume is solely concentrated in the first 30 minutes and then dries up, the bounce will fail. If the pre-market volume is sustained and increasing, the gap has a chance of filling. Additionally, analyze the size of the gap. If the gap is larger than the Average True Range (ATR) of the last 20 days, the odds of a full gap fill on the same day are statistically low, as the volatility required to fill it is indicative of a structural break.


The Retest Sequence: The Ultimate Conjunction Filter

The final, most powerful filter for avoiding a trap involves the retest of the low. A genuinely successful mean reversion bounce (that might turn into a reversal) will exhibit a classic “higher low” retest.

  • The Initial Bounce: Price falls to $50, bounces to $53.
  • The Retest: Price falls again from $53, but only to $51.50 (a higher low).
  • The Confirmation: Price bounces from $51.50 with force.

A trap is defined when the retest fails.

  • The Initial Bounce: Price falls to $50, bounces to $53.
  • The Failed Retest: Price falls from $53, slicing through $50 and closing at $49.50.
  • The Result: The bounce was a failure. The correct action is to short the $50 level as resistance, not to buy the “second dip.”

The Traps on the Retest: When bouncing, the market must deal with the “pivot point” of the initial low. If the retest holds but volume is absent, the bounce is weak. If the retest holds and the candlestick pattern is a strong engulfing bull, the bounce is authentic. Rely on the depth of the retest. If the retest takes price back to the mid-point of the initial bounce (a 50% retracement of the bounce), the buying pressure is weak. A healthy retest should only take price 25–33% deep into the prior bounce range.


Liquidity Sweeps: The Hunt for Stop Losses

Modern algorithmic trading has changed the nature of mean reversion. Algorithms specifically target clusters of stop losses to generate liquidity for large orders. This creates the “Sweep and Reject” pattern.

The Setup: A stock is trading in a range between $100 and $105. The mean reversion trader sets a buy order at $100. The algorithm pushes the price down to $99.90, triggering all stop losses below $100. This liquidity allows a large buyer to fill their massive order. The price then snaps back to $101.

The Trap: In this case, the bounce looks like mean reversion, but the trader who bought the stop loss hunt at $99.90 is actually buying from a seller who initiated a large short. Alternatively, during a crash to new lows, the sweep below the low triggers short sellers to take profit. If the price fails to rally after the sweep and sells off again, it indicates that the shorts were not covering; they were adding positions, and the sweep was a “liquidity grab” to fill sell orders. The filter here is Order Flow (if you have it). Look for the Delta (the difference between aggressive buyers and sellers). If price makes a new low but the Delta is rising (buyers are absorbing), the bounce is real. If price makes a new low and Delta falls (sellers are aggressively hitting bids), the bounce is a trap and will fail within minutes.


Divergence: The Most Misleading Filter

Many traders rely on RSI or MACD divergence to pick a bottom. A “bullish divergence” (price makes a lower low, RSI makes a higher low) is often taught as a high-probability buy signal.

Why Divergence Fails in Mean Reversion: In a powerful downtrend, RSI can remain in negative divergence for a long period. The oscillator resets itself by moving sideways while price continues to fall. This creates a “hidden divergence” (price makes a higher high, RSI makes a lower high) which signals continuation, but retail sees the standard divergence and buys the dip.

The Filter: Divergence is only valid if it occurs at a structural support level (a previous strong base, a Fibonacci extension) and is confirmed by a specific price action trigger (a bullish engulfing candle that closes above the high of the divergence bar). Without that confirmation, divergence is merely a descriptive tool, not a prescriptive signal. A failed bounce occurs when the divergent lows are followed by a bounce that fails to break the descending trendline. If the RSI turns up but the price cannot break the first resistance level, the divergence was a trap.


Position Sizing: The Lifeline on Failing Bounces

No filter is 100% accurate. On occasion, you will take a high-confluence trade that still fails. The final determinant of survival is how you allocate capital to these inherently risky setups.

The Asymmetry Rule: Mean reversion trades have a limited profit target (the mean). Therefore, your stop loss must be smaller than your target. If you are risking $1.00 per share to make $1.50, the risk-reward is acceptable. But if the trap is deep, a $1.00 risk can easily turn into a $2.00 loss if the bounce fails violently.

The “No-Averaging” Law: If a mean reversion trade is moving against you (price is not snapping back), do not add to the position. Adding to a losing reversion trade converts a scalp into a long-term investment in a falling asset. This is how small bounce failures become catastrophic portfolio losses. Assume every bounce is a trap until proven otherwise. Use the first entry as a probe. If the probe moves against you, you have your answer: the market is telling you the bounce has failed. Cut the loss immediately. A true reversion will usually not require you to chase it; it will present a second, better entry point. If you miss it, there are other trades.

Correlation Risk: Ensure your mean reversion trades are not all correlated to the same index. If you buy a dip in three tech stocks, and the Nasdaq fails its bounce, all three will trap you simultaneously. A filter on your portfolio level is as important as the filter on the chart. Diversify the bounce trades across different sectors (e.g., one in utilities, one in technology, one in energy) to protect against a sector-specific trend continuation.


The Invalidation Ritual: Pre-Commitment to the Exit

The psychological pain of a failed bounce is severe. Most traders freeze when the price breaks their invalidation level, hoping for one more tick. To avoid this, you must physically write down the exit conditions.

Condition A (Time Stop): If the position hasn’t moved in your favor within 3–5 bars on your trading timeframe, exit. A healthy bounce begins immediately after the reversal candle closes. If the price is stagnant at your entry price, the absorption is not occurring, and a trap is being set.

Condition B (Momentum Stop): If the second candle of your bounce is weak (small real body) compared to the first, it indicates the reversion impulse is already fading. Exit half your position. If the third candle is negative, exit the rest.

Condition C (Volume Stop): If the volume on the bounce is decreasing as price moves up, the bounce is running out of fuel. This is a warning sign that the trap is springing. Exit immediately.


Real-World Application: The Crypto Volatility Trap

Consider the cryptocurrency market, where mean reversion traps are rampant. Bitcoin drops 10% in an hour. The RSI hits extreme lows. Traders buy the “oversold” condition.

The Filter: Crypto markets have 24/7 trading. A bounce at 2:00 AM EST on thin liquidity is a trap. The bounce will occur due to a lack of sellers, but when the London session opens, the sellers return. The filter here is the session. Only trade mean reversion in crypto when the trading volume is liquid (London/New York overlap). Furthermore, check the Funding Rates on derivatives exchanges. If the bounce occurs while funding rates are still heavily positive (longs are paying shorts), it means the market was overheated and the bounce is part of a deleveraging cascade. The bounce will fail until the funding rates reset to neutral or negative. A “wash-out” bounce requires long liquidation to finish. If funding is still red hot, the bounce fails.

Another Example: Penny Stocks and High Short Interest.
A heavily shorted stock (e.g., retail meme names) declining sharply will often bounce violently as shorts take profits. This is a “short covering” rally.
The Trap: Once the shorts have covered, there is no fuel. If no new long-term (fundamental) buyers step in, the price falls back down. The failed bounce is identified by the velocity of the initial rally (too fast, parabolic) followed by an immediate consolidation that drifts downward. The high short interest created a temporary imbalance, but the mean reversion was to the unprofitable fundamental value. The filter is to check if insider buying exists or if the company’s cash burn rate justifies the current market cap. If not, the bounce is a selling opportunity, not a buying one.


Intermarket Analysis as a Filter

Before buying a dip in any commodity or stock, check the correlated asset.

  • If you are buying a dip in Gold, check the US Dollar Index (DXY). If DXY is making a high, the gold bounce is likely to fail.
  • If you are buying a dip in a Bond ETF (TLT), check if the Stock Market (SPX) is rising. If stocks are rallying hard, the demand for bonds will wane, causing the bond bounce to fail.
  • If you are buying a dip in a high-yield currency pair (AUD/USD), check the commodity prices (Copper). If Copper is crashing, the bounce in AUD/USD is against the fundamental flow of global growth. The intermarket relationship provides an advanced warning signal. If the correlated asset is breaking its own support, your bounce will fail.

The “W” Bottom vs. The “V” Bottom in Index Trading

When day trading index futures (ES, NQ), a common pattern is the “V” bottom bounce.

  • The Trap: The index drops 50 points in 5 minutes. It bounces 20 points in 2 minutes. Traders buy the V. The index then slides to new lows.
  • The Filter: A V-bottom requires an immediate, severe oversold condition accompanied by a massive imbalance in supply (program trading). For retail traders, it is safer to avoid V-bottoms entirely and wait for a “W” bottom (double bottom). The first spike up in a V is usually a short-squeeze against the low-liquidity pit. The “W” bottom involves the price retesting the low. If the second leg down holds the low, the bounce is more likely to succeed. The W pattern takes time to form, and that time allows the market to digest the selling pressure. A V-bottom that fails to form a W within the next 2-3 bars is almost certainly a trap. Buyers need to see a second wave of institutional support, not just a reflexive short-covering bounce.

The Role of News and Headline Risk During the Bounce

A bounce that occurs on the back of a “rumor” is more likely to fail than one on a “fact.”
Scenario: The market is falling. A news wire flashes “Federal Reserve considering pause in rate hikes.” The market bounces.
The Trap: The rumor is not officially confirmed. The bounce is speculative. When the next headline hits saying “Fed officials clarify no pause planned,” the bounce fails instantly.
The Filter: Assess the source of the bounce catalyst. Is it a data release (unemployment, CPI) or just commentary? Fundamental data releases are processed by algorithms and create a structural shift. Commentary creates volatility, not trend. If the bounce lacks a fundamental data catalyst, it is a high-risk trap. Furthermore, the lack of a news catalyst during a bounce is a warning sign—a quiet bounce above a broken level is often a “dead cat” bounce driven by short-term algorithms, not by a change in market participants’ risk appetite.


The Final Metric: R-Multiple Realism

Professional traders evaluate trades based on R-Multiples. A failed bounce in a low-volatility stock might cost you 1R. A failed bounce in a high-volatility stock (like Tesla or GameStop) can cost you 5R in a matter of minutes because of the wide spreads and slippage.

The Filter: If a stock has an ATR of $10, and the distance to your mean-reversion target is $5, but your stop loss needs to be placed $8 away to avoid noise, the trade has a poor reward-to-risk ratio. The high ATR relative to the reversion target indicates that the stock is too volatile for a mean reversion strategy. In such an environment, the market will overshoot to the downside, you will stop out, and only then will it revert to the mean. Filter out assets with high ATR/Price ratios. Focus solely on assets with stable, consistent volatility.


Conclusion on Execution (No Summary)

When analyzing a potential bounce, assume that all rising prices are corrective waves until the market structure proves otherwise. The bounce is guilty until proven innocent. This requires a shift in perspective from “the market is oversold, I must buy” to “the market is falling, why should it stop?” The onus of proof is on the bounce, not on the trend. Once a bounce fails, it fails fast. The key is not to be holding a position when the failure occurs. Respect the trend, verify the volume, check the higher timeframe, and pre-commit to your invalidation. The market will tell you if the bounce is real; do not tell the market that it is.

advertisement

latest posts

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.

Discover more from DNS Research

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading